OBJECTIVE: To compare the existence of radiographic abnormalities in two groups of patients, those with and without hip pain. METHODS: A total 222 patients were evaluated between March 2007 and April 2009; 122 complained of groin pain, and 100 had no symptoms. The individuals in both groups underwent radiographic examinations of the hip using the following views: anteroposterior, Lequesne false profile, Dunn, Dunn 45º, and Ducroquet. RESULTS: A total of 1110 radiographs were evaluated. Female patients were prevalent in both groups (52% symptomatic, 58% asymptomatic). There were statistically significant differences between the groups in age (p<0.0001), weight (p = 0.002) and BMI (p = 0.006). The positive findings in the group with groin pain consisted of the presence of a bump on the femoral head in the anteroposterior view (p<0.0001) or in the Dunn 45º view (p = 0.008). The difference in the a angle in the anteroposterior, Dunn, Dunn 45º, and Ducroquet views for all of the cases studied was p,0.0001. The joint space measurement differed significantly between groups in the Lequesne view (p = 0.007). The Lequesne anteversion angle (ρ) and the femoral offset measurement also differed significantly (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the best views for diagnosing a femoroacetabular impingement are the anteroposterior pelvic orthostatic, the Dunn 45º, and the Ducroquet views. The following findings correlated with hip pain: a decrease in the femoral offset, an increase in the α angle, an increase in the Lequesne ρ angle, a decrease in the CE angle of Wiberg, a thinner articular space and the presence of a bump on the femoral head-neck transition.

OBJETIVO: As revisões em dois tempos continuam sendo os métodos preferidos no tratamento das artroplastias infectadas do quadril. O procedimento em dois estágios apresenta várias desvantagens teóricas, ainda não comprovadas por estudos comparativos. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Em um estudo prospectivo, tratamos 68 pacientes com artroplastias infectadas de quadril com perdas ósseas e fístulas ativas, comparando 30 casos tratados em dois tempos sem espaçador (grupo controle) e 38 casos tratados em dois tempos com o uso de um espaçador de cimento adicionado a vancomicina (grupo de estudo). Um paciente faleceu após quatro meses da cirurgia e foi excluído do estudo. O seguimento médio foi de quatro anos (2-8,5 anos). RESULTADOS: A cirurgia em dois tempos sem espaçador controlou a infecção em 66,7% dos casos comparada a 89,1% (p<0,05) nos casos tratados com espaçador. No último seguimento, o Escore de Harris para Quadril passou de 19,3 a 69,0 no grupo controle e de 19,7 para 75,2 no grupo do estudo (p>0,05). A média de discrepância de membros inferiores foi de 2,6cm no grupo controle e de 1,5cm nos grupo do estudo (p<0,05). O grupo tratado com espaçador teve melhores resultados clínicos ao final do estudo (81,5% de bons resultados comparados a 60,0% do grupo tratado sem espaçador). CONCLUSÃO: O uso de espaçador adicionado a antibióticos no período intermediário do tratamento das artroplastias infectadas do quadril em dois tempos proporciona melhor controle de infecção, com bons resultados funcionais, sendo superior à cirurgia em dois tempos sem espaçador.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to compare 2 methods of treatment of chronic infection in hip arthroplasties-with or without an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. METHODS: In a prospective study, we treated 68 infected hip arthroplasties with discharging sinuses and bone loss, comparing 30 patients treated in 2 stages without the use of a spacer (control group) and 38 patients treated with a vancomycin-loaded spacer (study group). The average follow-up was 4 years (2-8.5 years). One patient died of unrelated causes 4 months after first-stage surgery and was excluded from the study. RESULTS: The 2-stage surgery without spacer controlled the infection in 66.7% of patients, and the 2-stage surgery using the spacer controlled it in 89.1% (P < 0.05). At last follow-up, the average Harris Hip Score increased from 19.3 to 69.0 in the control group versus 19.7 to 75.2 in the study group (P > 0.05). The average leg length discrepancy was 2.6 cm in the control group and 1.5 cm in the study group (P < 0.05). The patients treated with a spacer had better clinical results (81.5% of patients with good results against 60.0% for the control group). CONCLUSION: The use of an antibiotic-loaded spacer in the 2-stage treatment of infected hip arthroplasties provides better infection control with good functional results and is superior to treatment in 2 stages without a spacer. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level I-1.